Senator Wendy Davis is nearing the end of a 13 hour filibuster to block Senate Bill 5 in Texas. She has been speaking since 11:18am CDT, without eating, drinking, sitting, leaning on the podium, or going to the bathroom. She has only stopped speaking to take questions from other senators.
Why is SB5 this important? It is a sweeping abortion bill that Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards states, “If this passes, abortion would be virtually banned in the state of
Texas, and many women could be forced to resort to dangerous and unsafe
measures.” (Source)
The bill's regulations and restrictions would most likely wind up closing all but 5 clinics in the state of Texas.
In a state so large, forcing women to travel to access legal procedures will decrease their ability to do so, especially with waiting periods in effect. Travel cost, time off work, and finding child care amplify the impact of the new regulations on women.
Additionally, the bill refers to many "scientific" findings that are not backed by medical professionals.
Senator Davis is reading analysis of the bill, the stories of women, and updated, medically approved science. You can watch a live stream of it here and join the thousands of people filling the capitol wearing orange.
Add your story to those Senator Davis is telling here, and help her to maintain the floor.
Follow on Twitter: Trending now #sb5 #txlege #standwithwendy
Update (6/26/13 1:50am CDT): A vote occurred in the Senate after the filibuster was stopped on technicalities. However, the vote occurred after midnight, and is therefore not valid. However, because of how unclear things are, and an issue with the time stamp on the vote having been changed, the Senate has been called to a caucus behind closed doors. Cecile Richards, still at the capitol, just addressed the crowds telling them not to leave yet. We are still waiting.
Update (6/26/13 2:22am CDT): After the caucus, Senator Davis texted: "The Lieutenant Governor has agreed that SB-5 is dead." The official vote was recorded at 12:03. As Cecile Richards reminds us though, the fight isn't over, and has to continue.
Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedom. Show all posts
20130625
Michigan Stands with Texas
Labels:
abortion,
activism,
austin,
ban,
bill,
comprehensive,
coverage,
freedom,
health,
legislation,
reproductive justice,
texas,
wendy davis,
women's health,
women's rights
Location:
Michigan, USA
20130607
48th Anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut
Marking Anniversary of Legalized Contraception, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan Celebrates Expanded Access to Birth Control under New Health Care Law
“We Can’t Let Politicians Take Us Back to the Days Before Griswold”
On the 48th anniversary of Griswold v. Connecticut, the historic 1965 Supreme Court decision legalizing the use of contraception by married couples, Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan is celebrating the gains made by women since the decision, and is reminding Michigan residents of the expanded access to birth control made possible by the Affordable Care Act. Access to birth control has ushered in a generation of healthy, empowered women and families and thanks to the Affordable Care Act, birth control is now covered as part of the preventive benefit, without a co-pay. June also marks the 53rd anniversary of the approval of the pill as an oral contraceptive by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Access to birth control shouldn’t be a revolutionary idea, but unfortunately it is to some — with a small group of vocal politicians and bosses still working to deny women access. Forty-eight years after the Griswold v. Connecticut Supreme Court decision, 99 percent of women say they’ve used birth control at some point in their lives — many for a wide range of health reasons in addition to preventing pregnancy. Thanks to this landmark court decision, the number of women in the U.S. labor force has more than tripled, and women’s income now constitutes a growing proportion of family income. These benefits will only be expanded thanks to the Affordable Care Act’s birth control benefit, which enables millions of women to get access to the full range of FDA-approved birth control options without a co-pay.
The court's landmark decision — coming five years to the month after oral contraceptives became available to American women and 49 years after Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in the U.S. — provided the first constitutional protection for birth control for women across the country. Before that, a woman’s ability to control the size and timing of her family depended on her zip code.
SINCE GRISWOLD AND THE FDA APPROVAL OF THE PILL:
Access to birth control has expanded opportunities for women and has helped them move closer to economic equality. Since Griswold, the number of women in the U.S. labor force has more than tripled, the number of women lawyers has increased ten-fold, the number completing four or more years of college has increased more than five-fold, and in 2010 women received more than half of all doctoral degrees.A 2012 report from the Guttmacher Institute confirmed that women use contraception to better achieve their life goals, with the majority of participants reporting that contraception has had a significant impact on their lives, allowing them to take better care of themselves and their families, support themselves financially, complete their education, and keep or get a job.
Research finds that availability of the pill is responsible for a third of women’s wage increases relative to men. By the 1980s and ’90s, the women who had early access to the pill were making eight percent more each year than those who did not.
According to the Guttmacher Institute, 58 percent of pill users report that they use it for a wide range of health reasons, like treating endometriosis, a common but little-understood disease that affects 5.5 million women and is a leading cause of infertility.
You can learn more about the impact of legal birth control and the challenges that remain here: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/Griswold_v_Connecticut.pdf.
THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT’S BIRTH CONTROL BENEFIT:
· Seven in ten Americans (70 percent) believe that health insurance companies should be required to cover the full cost of birth control, just as they do for other preventive services.· Approximately 47 million women nationally, including 4.9 million Latinas, stand to benefit from the Affordable Care Act’s women’s preventive health care provision, including no co-pay birth control. Already, it’s estimated that nearly 27 million women nationally are benefiting from the women’s preventive services provision which went into effect last August.
· You can read stories from supporters of the birth control benefit here: http://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/files/1213/6537/4425/4-8-13_BC_Stories.pdf
Every year, more than 750 Planned Parenthood health centers nationwide see nearly three million patients — two million specifically for birth control information and services. Planned Parenthood also offers online tools that can help people start a conversation with providers about health care: My Method can prepare women for a conversation with their providers about the most appropriate and best birth control option for them.
For more information, visit: www.miplannedparenthood.org
Labels:
birth control,
freedom,
Griswold v. Connecticut,
planned parenthood,
PPAM,
ppfa,
prochoice,
reproduction,
sexuality,
women's rights
Location:
Michigan, USA
20130531
Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act
The Abortion Insurance Opt-Out Act. This title is inherently misleading.
It sounds as if you personally will be able to pay less by simply opt-out of
insurance coverage for abortion. This is not the case. You will instead have to opt-in for insurance coverage for abortion services, including
those in cases of rape and incest.
In
order to receive coverage for abortion, women need to purchase an
additional rider – indeed making women plan ahead for an unplanned pregnancy or
an unplanned act of sexual violence. As noted by Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan spokesperson Meghan
Groen, insurance riders are mostly unavailable, and as they rely on market
demand, riders for abortion would be more limited than others. “Nobody
anticipates having an unwanted pregnancy,” stated Groen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
